Analisis Yuridis Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Dalam Menangani Perkara Nomor: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst.

Umam, Fajar Khairul (2025) Analisis Yuridis Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Dalam Menangani Perkara Nomor: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst. Undergraduate Thesis thesis, UIN. K. H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.

	Text 1518082_COVER_BAB 1 DAN BAB 5.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text 1518082_FULL EDIT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB)
	Text 1518082_LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (907kB)

Abstract

Fajar Khairul Umam, 2025. Legal Analysis of the Absolute Competence of the Central Jakarta District Court in Handling Case Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst. Thesis, State Administrative Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia, K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid State Islamic University of Pekalongan, Advisor Yunas Derta Luluardi, M.A. The decision of the Central Jakarta District Court number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst, which granted the Prima Party's lawsuit against the KPU, has sparked controversy because it was considered to have exceeded its authority and was unconstitutional. This is related to the absolute competence to try the election case between the KPU and the Prima Party and the order to postpone the 2024 election. Behind the decision, there must be a legal basis and the birth of the decision must have legal implications or consequences. This study aims to determine how the judge considered the law in Decision number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst and what the legal consequences are of the birth of the decision. This study uses a normative legal research method or also called doctrinal legal research with a Legislation approach, a conceptual approach and a Case approach. The data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis (Descriptive Analysis), namely collecting data according to the actual situation, then compiling, processing and analyzing it to obtain a picture of the problem, concluding data, sorting data into certain conceptual units, certain categories, and certain themes from the data that appears. Delivered with a conclusion that is specific or concrete. The results of this study are that the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst is a legally flawed legal product and is classified as a decision that cannot be executed because the institution that resolved the case is not an authorized institution, namely the State Administrative Court, and the Order to Postpone the General Election carried out by the Central Jakarta District Court is an excess of Authority where it should and actually as regulated in the Laws and Regulations is the Authority of the General Election Commission. This excess and inaccuracy bring about the legal product of the Decision of Case Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst which has many legal implications or consequences, including: failure to fulfill legal certainty, justice, usefulness and legal accuracy.

Actions (login required)

View Item